(1) If a person has reason to believe that he may be arrested on an accusation of having committed a non- bailable offence, he may apply to the Hon’ble High Court or the Session Court for a direction under this section and that court may, if it thinks fit, direct that in the event of such arrest, he shall be released on bail.

(2) When the Hon’ble High Court or the Session Court makes a direction under sub-section (1), it may include such conditions in the directions in the light of the facts of the particular case, as it may think fit, including:

  • a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by investigating officer.
  • a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer,
  • a condition that the person shall not leave country without prior permission of the court or any other condition as may be imposed under sub-section (3) of section 437, as if the bail were granted under that section.

(3) If such person is thereafter arrested without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station on such accusation, and is prepared either at the time of arrest or at any time while in the custody of such officer to give bail, he shall be released on bail; and if a Magistrate taking cognizance of such offence decides that a warrant should be issued in the first instance against that person, he shall issue a bailable warrant in conformity with the direction of the court under sub-section (1).


If a person has an apprehension or reason to believe that he may be arrested for accusation of having committed an offence which is non-bailable , he may apply to Hon’ble High Court or Session Court for direction to the investigating authority, that in the event of arrest he shall be released on bail.

No time limit could be fixed while granting Anticipatory Bail
Sushila Agarwal v. State of Delhi

Not granting Anticipatory bail may cause violation of fundamental rights of an individual under Article 21 of the Constitution of India
Badresh Bipinbai Seth v. State of Gujarat

Compliance of section 41 (A) Cr.PC is mandatory in case of offences punishable with maximum 7 years imprisonment
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar

Rights of First Informant/ Original Complainant to intervene in Anticipatory Bail Application
Vinay Potdar v. State of Maharashtra

Is it Mandatory for police to arrest a person only because his ABA is rejected?

The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in case of M.C Abraham and Anr v. State of Maharashtra has held that it is not mandatory for the police to arrest a person merely because his/her Anticipatory Bail has been rejected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post


RERA was formed under the important REAL ESTATE REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT ACT, 2016 (RERA) concerning matters within Real Estate Sector which is related to Sale/Purchase of Properties, Due diligence of

This website "" of Mumbai, provides Free & general information on Indian laws and Legal System and it hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage that may be caused by any errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.

Daclegal.inassumes no liability for the interpretation and / or use of the information contained on this website, nor does it offer any warranty, express or implied.

This website is not a source or a form of advertising or solicitation nor is it intended to be so. The contents of this website should not be construed as legal advice. The reader or viewer or user should not consider this information to be an invitation for a lawyer-client relationship and should not rely on information provided herein. Advice of a competent lawyer / counsel / attorney licensed to practice in the reader's / viewer's / user's country / state should always be sought. The transmission, receipt or use of this website does not and shall not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. No recipients of content from this website must act, or refrain from acting, based upon any / all of the contents of this website.

Daclegal.indoes not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this website or in a country / state where this website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that country / state. does not intend links from this site to any other Internet websites to be referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with the linked websites. It is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties about, the contents of any other websites to which links may be provided from this website. The reader or viewer or user is also warned that the use of e-mail for confidential or sensitive information is prone to risks of lack of confidentiality associated with sending e-mail over the Internet.

The reader or viewer acknowledges that he or she has read and understood the disclaimer as provided hereinabove. That the viewer wishes to know more about Indian laws and Legal System on his or her own accord and use unconditionally. The reader or viewer or user further acknowledges that there has been no inducement, invitation or solicitation of any nature whatsoever from or any of its team or members to create a lawyer-client relationship through this website. The Website is Free Legal Information Service Provider.

× Whatsapp Chat