Uncategorized Only Hindus can marry under Hindu Marriage Act: Supreme Court on plea by Indian-American Christian man seeking quashing of case

Only Hindus can marry under Hindu Marriage Act: Supreme Court on plea by Indian-American Christian man seeking quashing of case

The plea by the accused states that a woman falsely implicated him after he declined to marry her on learning of her addiction to drugs and alcohol.

The Supreme Court on Monday observed that only Hindus can marry under the Hindu Marriage Act and that any marriage between inter-faith couples under the same is void [Ajay P Mathew v. State of Telangana and anr].

A Bench of Justices KM Joseph and BV Nagarathna posted the matter for final hearing in February.

The plea by the appellant-accused, an Indian-American Christian man, states that the complainant has falsely implicated him after he declined to marry her on learning of her addiction to drugs and alcohol.

The woman contended that they had conducted marriage rituals as per Hindu customs, however, the man has since married another Indian woman in America.

During the hearing, Justice Joseph remarked,

“The marriage is void.”

“Only Hindus can marry under the Hindu [Marriage] Act,” Justice Nagarathna weighed in.

The appeal, filed through advocate Sriram Parrakat, has challenged an August 2017 order of the Telangana High Court that had refused to quash proceedings against the petitioner under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) before a magistrate in Hyderabad.

Section 494 provides that a spouse’s second marriage, done while still married to their first partner, is void and punishable for a jail term of up to seven years.

“Except her statement, she has not filed any proof of the alleged marriage with her by the petitioner, as it has not at all taken place. The petitioner is a Christian and the Respondent No.2 is a Hindu.”

The petitioner claimed that he has never converted and, pertinently, the alleged marriage with the complainant was never recorded prior to the alleged ceremony, nor was it registered after, as is required under the Special Marriage Act.

The plea raises grievance with the fact that the police took cognisance of the offence in the absence of any evidence, based on the statement of the complainant. Further, even the chargesheet is only based on her statements and those of her family.

“…the Hon’ble High Court has failed to look in to the aspect that the Police machinery was misused and has acted on the behest of the Respondent No:2/ Defacto Complaint.”

The petition adds that the following questions of law are also raised:

Whether the marriage between two different-faith individuals performed as per Hindu rites and rituals without conversion is valid in the eyes of law?

Whether the marriage under Special marriage Act can be performed in the absence of the marriage Officers?

Advocates Sreenath S, Sriram Parakkat and MS Vishnu Shankar appeared for the appellant.

The plea has been drawn by Senior Advocate Santosh Paul and advocate Promila.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

This website "daclegal.in" of Mumbai, provides Free & general information on Indian laws and Legal System and it hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage that may be caused by any errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.

Daclegal.inassumes no liability for the interpretation and / or use of the information contained on this website, nor does it offer any warranty, express or implied.

This website is not a source or a form of advertising or solicitation nor is it intended to be so. The contents of this website should not be construed as legal advice. The reader or viewer or user should not consider this information to be an invitation for a lawyer-client relationship and should not rely on information provided herein. Advice of a competent lawyer / counsel / attorney licensed to practice in the reader's / viewer's / user's country / state should always be sought. The transmission, receipt or use of this website does not and shall not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. No recipients of content from this website must act, or refrain from acting, based upon any / all of the contents of this website.

Daclegal.indoes not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this website or in a country / state where this website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that country / state.

Daclegal.in does not intend links from this site to any other Internet websites to be referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with the linked websites. It is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties about, the contents of any other websites to which links may be provided from this website. The reader or viewer or user is also warned that the use of e-mail for confidential or sensitive information is prone to risks of lack of confidentiality associated with sending e-mail over the Internet.

The reader or viewer acknowledges that he or she has read and understood the disclaimer as provided hereinabove. That the viewer wishes to know more about Indian laws and Legal System on his or her own accord and use unconditionally. The reader or viewer or user further acknowledges that there has been no inducement, invitation or solicitation of any nature whatsoever from daclegal.in or any of its team or members to create a lawyer-client relationship through this website. The Website is Free Legal Information Service Provider.

× Whatsapp Chat