Uncategorized Court Cannot Reject Plea For Divorce By Mutual Consent Just Because Husband & Wife Are Residing In Same Premises-Karnataka High Court

Court Cannot Reject Plea For Divorce By Mutual Consent Just Because Husband & Wife Are Residing In Same Premises-Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that just because an estranged couple are residing under the same roof, a court cannot reject their plea seeking seeking dissolution of marriage by mutual consent, on this ground alone.

The estranged couple, acting as petitioners, filed a Petition seeking a decree of dissolution of their marriage based on mutual consent. They presented certain grounds to support their claim. The case was referred to Mediation, and on January 2, 2023, a report was submitted to the court indicating a settlement had been reached. Additionally, the parties submitted a Compromise Petition reflecting the terms of the settlement reached during the conciliation process.

However, the learned Judge of the Family Court in Bengaluru dismissed the request for dissolution of the marriage solely on the basis that the spouses continue to reside in the same household.

The counsel representing the Petitioners raised objections to the impugned order, arguing that in cases such as this, the fact that the parties reside under the same roof is of minimal significance, except in determining territorial jurisdiction. The counsel contends that the order made by the court, based solely on the cohabitation of the spouses, is flawed in its reasoning and perplexing to the Court. The counsel suggests that this fact could potentially demonstrate the amicable behavior of the spouses despite their ongoing disputes.

The Court, after careful consideration, has determined that the mere fact of an estranged couple residing under the same roof cannot be used as a sole ground for rejecting their plea for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. The Court further emphasized that such a reasoning constitutes a significant error evident on the face of the record.

The Court acknowledged that the fact of cohabitation, despite marital discord, may potentially indicate the spouses’ commitment to maintaining a civil and respectful environment within the household. This observation suggests that the behavior of the spouses, in the midst of their disagreements, may demonstrate a positive cultural attitude and values.

In light of the above, the Court found the reasoning provided by the lower court in denying relief to the parties to be erroneous and of substantial consequence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

This website "daclegal.in" of Mumbai, provides Free & general information on Indian laws and Legal System and it hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage that may be caused by any errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.

Daclegal.inassumes no liability for the interpretation and / or use of the information contained on this website, nor does it offer any warranty, express or implied.

This website is not a source or a form of advertising or solicitation nor is it intended to be so. The contents of this website should not be construed as legal advice. The reader or viewer or user should not consider this information to be an invitation for a lawyer-client relationship and should not rely on information provided herein. Advice of a competent lawyer / counsel / attorney licensed to practice in the reader's / viewer's / user's country / state should always be sought. The transmission, receipt or use of this website does not and shall not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. No recipients of content from this website must act, or refrain from acting, based upon any / all of the contents of this website.

Daclegal.indoes not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this website or in a country / state where this website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that country / state.

Daclegal.in does not intend links from this site to any other Internet websites to be referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with the linked websites. It is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties about, the contents of any other websites to which links may be provided from this website. The reader or viewer or user is also warned that the use of e-mail for confidential or sensitive information is prone to risks of lack of confidentiality associated with sending e-mail over the Internet.

The reader or viewer acknowledges that he or she has read and understood the disclaimer as provided hereinabove. That the viewer wishes to know more about Indian laws and Legal System on his or her own accord and use unconditionally. The reader or viewer or user further acknowledges that there has been no inducement, invitation or solicitation of any nature whatsoever from daclegal.in or any of its team or members to create a lawyer-client relationship through this website. The Website is Free Legal Information Service Provider.

× Whatsapp Chat